|
Aurora on Windows 7 |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | |
Pony_God
Senior Member Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Location: Naples, FL Online Status: Offline Posts: 551 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Aurora on Windows 7 Posted: 20 Dec 2009 at 11:41pm |
Ah.. an ATOM chip, tha's Intel's new low/under powered/rebranded Celeron burpose built for light use laptops, isn't it?
|
|
Kirek
Newbie Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply Posted: 17 Dec 2009 at 9:21pm |
It's a netbook... XP on an Atom CPU... I also found some other stuff running on th enotebook, killed that today and will se how it runs tonight. So far so good, but still around %40 CPU.
|
|
Pony_God
Senior Member Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Location: Naples, FL Online Status: Offline Posts: 551 |
Quote Reply Posted: 16 Dec 2009 at 9:08pm |
That high!?
That's Win7?
Our Server 2k3 CPU is at 2% total and 200M total used out of 2G.
|
|
Kirek
Newbie Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply Posted: 16 Dec 2009 at 8:48pm |
I setup my netbook to run the show tonight, so far it's running fine. CPU metrics show it's averaging about 300M and %50 CPU, with CPU peaks around %60.
Driving 48 channels, not sure how much the channel count effects things though. |
|
Kirek
Newbie Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply Posted: 15 Dec 2009 at 12:07pm |
And 4.5 years without patching the box.... can we say hacked? :-) But a *NIX version of boraelis would be nice... we could then embed it into a small appliance. |
|
LightChristmas
Beta Testers Joined: 15 Oct 2007 Location: Equality, IL Online Status: Offline Posts: 993 |
Quote Reply Posted: 28 Nov 2009 at 11:47am |
The scheduler will run perfectly on a mere 700MHz P3 under XP. Anything more than that is icing on the cake.
The sequencer runs best on at least a 2GHz Pentium. Dual-core helps but not necessary. |
|
Pony_God
Senior Member Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Location: Naples, FL Online Status: Offline Posts: 551 |
Quote Reply Posted: 27 Nov 2009 at 10:42pm |
I can't recommend a netbook, I've never evn used one...
Our show server is a Supermicro 1U server running Windows server 2003 with 2G of RAM and nothing else.
You do not need a good video card to run the show, only for sequencing.
|
|
mmciver
Newbie Joined: 29 Sep 2008 Location: Phoenix Arizona Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Quote Reply Posted: 27 Nov 2009 at 10:29pm |
Would you recommend the Acer Nettop for a scheduler machine.
|
|
Mike
What do you mean I have enough lights? |
|
mmciver
Newbie Joined: 29 Sep 2008 Location: Phoenix Arizona Online Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
Quote Reply Posted: 27 Nov 2009 at 10:27pm |
Does this mean that you are currently running Aurora Scheduler on this maching? I am looking for a good low cost machine to dedicate to running my sequences and would love some feedback. I currently have an old IBM T40 computer with 512Mb of ram and it is having issues running 10 songs in my show without hanging up. I am having to drop it to 4 sequences to keep in going.
HELP!!! |
|
Mike
What do you mean I have enough lights? |
|
Pony_God
Senior Member Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Location: Naples, FL Online Status: Offline Posts: 551 |
Quote Reply Posted: 23 Nov 2009 at 5:16pm |
It was about the same, smaller picture so it was a bit harder to see though.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |